Showing posts with label petronas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label petronas. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2014

kisah si tanggang moden dalam Petronas -keluhan MTEM

Kenyataan Media ini dipetik dari Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Melayu (MTEM) bagi cluster industry Minyak dan Gas (Oil and Gas industry). Kita sedia maklum inisiatif mewujudkan Vendor di kalangan usahawan Bumiputera yang berkecimpung dalam industry ini kerana polisi Dasar Ekonomi Baru dan kesimabungannya Dasar Ekonomi Nasional. Namun yang merisaukan ialah wujudnya usaha sulit dalam PETRONAS untuk menggagalkan usaha ini dan Nampak jelas President dan CEO sekarang dicurigai kerana tindak tanduknya yang membiarkan keadaan jadi sedemikian. Baca Teks Ucapan untuk edaran akhbar dalam siding media di Bangsar 9 Januari 2014.


SIDANG MEDIA
MTEM MENGECAM TINDAKAN TERHADAP ROMBAKAN LEGASI PETRONAS DAN MENUNTUT AGAR TAN SRI SHAMSUL TAMPIL MENJAWAB PERSOALAN
Akhir-akhir ini semakin jelas kelihatan satu siri kempen yang disusun penuh teliti oleh Petronas bagi menenggelamkan isu-isu yang semakin banyak dibangkitkan. Mereka juga secara tiba-tiba begitu bermurah hati menganugerahkan kontrak-kontrak besar kepada syarikat Bumiputera terpilih. Walaupun langkah itu boleh dilihat sebagai pro-aktif, namun isu sebenar tidak pernah dijawab. Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Melayu (MTEM) mengutuk usaha ‘sulit’ oleh individu tertentu dalam Petronas untuk merombak dasar, personaliti dan keputusan pelaburan demi memenuhi matlamat peribadi dan keuntungan semata-mata. Spekulasi mula hangat apabila Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad mengumumkan peletakan jawatannya sebagai Penasihat Petronas pada bulan lalu. Namun, YAB Dato’ Sri Najib Tun Razak dengan pantas merayu agar Tun mempertimbangkan kembali keputusannya dan Tun Dr. Mahathir telah memberikan reaksi yang positif. Sebaliknya, Petronas mengambil tindakan berdiam diri dan kami dimaklumkan menerusi sumber yang boleh dipercayai bagaimana layanan buruk diberikan terhadap Tun Mahathir apabila pejabatnya di KLCC dikosongkan dalam tempoh 24 jam selepas peletakan jawatan tersebut. Adakah begini caranya Petronas membalas jasa negarawan yang telah meletakkan Petronas ke tahap Fortune 500 sedangkan sumbangannya selama 27 tahun memang tidak boleh disangkal sehingga hari ini? Adakah mereka terlalu gembira dengan ketiadaan Tun?

 Tun Dr. Mahathir tidak akan meletak jawatan sewenang-wenangnya, bahkan beliau seorang negarawan yang masih cergas berkongsi pengalamannya sama ada melalui pertemuan-pertemuan mahupun penulisannya. Pejabat Tun masih sibuk menerima kunjungan tetamu, namun Petronas sebaliknya dengan sombong melayan Tun dengan buruk sekali.

Walaupun Petronas merupakan syarikat yang ditubuhkan untuk kepentingan umum, kita tidak pernah mendapat akses kepada maklumat dan data berkaitan prestasi Petronas yang sebenar kerana ia adalah dokumen sulit. Lebih mencurigakan apabila Petronas mengambil pendekatan menjawab aduan dan kritikan, atau bertindak secara lebih progresif, Petronas lebih suka menjawab menggunakan kempen media melalui data-data yang menyebelahinya. Syarikat tersebut berterusan membisu walaupun diajukan pelbagai persoalan oleh MTEM. Antaranya kes pemberian kontrak bernilai RM10 billion kepada kontraktor Bumiputera sedangkan nilai belanjawan Petronas bernilai lebih RM300 billion, atau kes VDP Petronas yang telah menyusut daripada 79 kepada 9 buah sahaja sehingga tahun lalu. Disamping itu, Petronas cuma melantik 3 VDP baru semenjak diterajui oleh Tan Sri Shamsul, kes Bread Story dan nasi  lemak, laba yang berterusan untuk Technip dan Dialog, serta pelbagai masalah yang menghantui usaha Petronas di peringkat antarabangsa.

Budaya mengelak daripada menjawab soalan tidak berlaku kepada MTEM semata-mata, tetapi turut digunapakai apabila dipersoalkan oleh kerajaan mahupun pembangkang. Persoalan yang sama telah diajukan oleh perwakilan UMNO dalam Perhimpunan Agung UMNO baru-baru ini, tetapi tidak pernah mendapat maklum balas yang memuaskan daripada Petronas.

Pendek kata, walaupun Petronas cuba memaparkan kejayaan demi kejayaan, hakikatnya pemain industri dan pengguna sedang berada dalam situasi ekonomi yang amat sukar sekarang.

MTEM mendapati bagaimana Petronas secara tersembunyi menstruktur semula polisi-polisi penting semenjak teraju kepimpinannya diambilalih oleh Tan Sri Shamsul. Malangnya polisi yang telah diubah ini telah menyebabkan begitu ramai usahawan Petronas terkandas, sebaliknya peluang-peluang tersebut diraih oleh pelabur luar yang telah membentuk kerjasama dengan syarikat milik Petronas atas dasar perkongsian risiko. Segalanya terjadi melalui rombakan semula SWEC Codes (Standardised Works and Equipments Category) dan MTR (Minimum Technical Requirements). Selain daripada rombakan polisi, strategi pelaburan juga nampaknya sudah berpaling ke arah negara maju sekaligus melukakan perasaan sahabat-sahabat dari negara dunia ketiga yang telah dijalin sekian lama.

 Petronas bukan sekadar syarikat minyak dan gas biasa. Ia bukan hak milik Tan Sri Shamsul dan ahli lembaga pengarah yang lain, tetapi merupakan aset berharga yang dimilik oleh seluruh rakyat Malaysia. Petronas menyumbang sebegitu banyak keuntungannya demi membangun negara dan itu merupakan suatu tanggungajawab yang tidak perlu dipersoalkan lagi.

Sekiranya legasi baru atau impian memecahkan rekod keuntungan yang menjadi pendorong utama Tan Sri Shamsul, kita tetap mempertikai keupayaannya. Tan Sri Shamsul sebenarnya tidak pernah mewarisi kepincangan sebagaimana yang sering didakwa, tetapi mewarisi sebuah syarikat bertaraf Fortune 500, mewarisi tanggungjawab untuk berbakti kepada rakyat Malaysia dan bukan kepada para pelabur semata-mata. Tan Sri Shamsul perlu bertanggungjawab kepada tokoh-tokoh terdahulu yang telah membina landasan terbaik dan selesa buatnya. Negarawan dan tokoh korporat yang hebat seperti Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, Tan Sri Azizan Zainul Abidin, Tan Sri Hassan Merican bahkan Tun Dr Mahathir sendiri telah berjaya membuktikan kecemerlangan dan kesetiaan mereka kepada negara dan kepada Petronas. Legasi kecemerlangan berlaku secara berkesinambungan oleh tokoh-tokoh peneraju Petronas dan tidak pernah diputuskan.

Tan Sri Shamsul mendakwa bahawa beliau tidak pernah mengidamkan jawatan tertinggi Petronas. Barangkali mengenangkan betapa sukarnya memikul tanggungajwab sebaik tokoh-tokoh Petronas sebelum ini. Namun, apabila diteliti prestasi dan halatuju syarikat tersebut hari ini, mungkin ada baiknya Tan Sri Shamsul menolak pelawaan tersebut dahulu.

MTEM akan terus komited dalam memperjuangkan keresahan para pendokong Petronas yang sedang dirundung malapetaka ini serta suara masyarakat yang prihatin. Namun setiap kesabaran ada batasnya dan kita melihat semakin ramai mereka yang tampil kehadapan untuk bersuara. Tan Sri Shamsul harus berani tampil untuk menjelaskan pelan tindakan serta polisi Petronas yang wajib mendahulukan kebajikan warganegara Malaysia melebihi segala yang lain. Jika tidak mampu, beliau sewajarnya berundur.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

PETRONAS ARAHKAN RAFIZI RAMLI LETAK JAWATAN

 


 
Selepas meletakkan jawatan sebagai Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif di pejabat penasihat kerajaan Selangor pada bulan Jun yang lalu dan bakal dihadapkan dengan hukuman yang cukup berat dibawah Akta BAFIA 1989 kerana menceroboh dan menyebarkan akaun peribadi pelanggan bank, kini Rafizi Ramli bakal dihadapkan dengan satu lagi tuduhan.

Sepandai-pandai tupai melompat akhirnya jatuh ke tanah jua... Kali ini budak suruhan Anwar ini dikatakan telah 'KANTOI' dengan membuat tuntutan palsu kepada majikannya Petronas.
Petronas telah mengarahkan Rafizi Ramli supaya meletakkan jawatan serta merta ... Tuntutan palsu dari segi apa, taklah pula diberitahu.. 
 
Bagaimana Rafizi boleh berada dalam Petronas? HR Petronas kena siasat siapa lagi yang menyebarkan maklumat rahsia dalaman Petronas dan bekerja untuk musuh negara!
 
Berita ini saya petik dari Merah Mato 29 September 2012 di SINI.
 
 
Nota penulis -p/s kesah tuntutan palsu dan kakitangan diarah meletak jawatan dari Petronas bukan baru, palsukan maklumat peribadipon diarah meletakkan jawatan!..

Friday, June 1, 2012

The secret to Anwar's enormous wealth and why Hassan Merican was given the boot by Najib Razak

Originally taken from CHAPTER FOUR: THE FAMILY FIRM IS LAUNCHED; OR ANWAR. BHD


One might, in reading what I’ve shared so far, assume that the ex-pat community in Malaysia in the 1980s, commercial and intelligence service, were all Anwar obsessives; or at least, that those of us who contributed to the “I” Files were. This is hardly so. I, for example, was busy falling in love with my Malaysian secretary, working up the courage to ask her out, marrying her, and then beginning a family with her. In between, I worked hundreds of matters, the overwhelming majority of which had nothing or little to do with Anwar, and almost all of which revolved around ending the Soviets’ murderous regime once and for all.

Aside from Anwar’s continued ideological war on the Chinese and Christians – he had banned the singing of Christmas carols at shopping malls and public places, and rearranged the school holidays so Christmas did not fall during the long vacation period – his day-to-day doings did not significantly register for most of us.

Most of us had similar stories. The thing about Anwar Ibrahim, you must see, is that he was very different from almost everyone but Mahathir, in that he rapidly began to occupy the centre stage, and not long after he ascended to the post of Education Minister, one could not run any sort of intelligence operation in KL without running into him, his subordinates, his influence, or his financial connections.
We of course from time to time made him our focus, but usually, he simply appeared again and again on our radar. It was especially in his financial connections that he kept intruding into our daily lives, because as one soon discovered, Anwar had his fingers everywhere, directly or indirectly. There were already the Saudi ties, of course, and the House of Saud is composed of terribly shrewd investors; they choose their assets carefully, and they always take the long position.

But one did not then ascend the Umno ranks without money, and more than a few ringgits at that. Whatever his other faults, Anwar has always been a keen student of power, and he understood early the need to develop not only his own funding, but an array of financial backers who would help him rise in the ranks.

His financial empire – which has held him in good stead for decades, through good times and bad – began with the Saudis, but continued with his marriage. It continues to this day, and is how he is able to control his party’s internal elections, and how he always seems to end up in the very best hotels when he travels.

It is here that I must beg your indulgence, dear reader. To understand Anwar’s financial empire – how he built it and how he maintains it – will require that we step outside of the chronological narrative I have largely favoured to date. Nevertheless, it is a story worth telling, especially in light of Anwar’s decisions in the 1990s and after his release from prison to style himself one of the common men of Malaysia – at least in his dealings with ordinary Malaysians and Western reporters.
My understanding of the matter began as I was hunting the Communists’’ last vestiges, not long before the coup that overthrew Gorbachev and ended with the complete dissolution of the Soviet Union.
“How is Perak?”
The Yank, a Company man, was not asking me about the weather in the state. As I’d moved up in the world, I’d gained quite the reputation for hounding the Soviets and their allies into the waiting arms of local police and foreign intelligence wherever they hid. My legend was enhanced by my team, a group of brilliant young men from across the globe whose parents to a one had been devout Communists, and had turned away on seeing Stalin’s purges; and by the Americans, who had under Reagan and then the elder Bush launched a multi-front black ops and military buildup war across the globe, determined to shatter the Soviet Empire once and for all. Southeast Asia was no different.
But without being immodest, I was quite good, and I knew it. “Dead,” I replied. “Selangor and Penang are all that’s left, and they’re just stragglers.” I was telling him what he already knew, or I wouldn’t have told him; but we were involved in a clever little game in which he was praising me, and I was pretending not to realise it.
He nodded, a corner of his mouth turning up in a grin. He was almost a stereotype, a muscular fellow from Nebraska with a crew cut and a square jaw, but he was terribly clever, and he knew that Gorbachev was talking about openness to foreign reporters while doing the usual Soviet number on dissidents and ethnic minorities, usually Muslims, at home. He reveled in the Soviets’ demise, and I had him pegged as a future station chief, if he wasn’t already.
But that’s not why he’d come to my office. My new secretary had been uncertain about him, and my old secretary was at home with our new son, so I’d had to clear him in. I was curious, to say the least. I waited for him to speak, and very shortly, he did.
“We’re worried about Malaysia,” he said. I was a bit perplexed – hadn’t I made clear to him and the Box 850 fellows who had my office bugged (telephone, desk lamp, door handle, and left blind string) that the Russians weren’t a threat anymore? – but seeing the look on my face, he shook his head. “Not about them. Have you come across anything about any … Government ministers while finishing Perak?”
Before I could nod, he opened his briefcase. “And would you be interested in some quid pro quo? For you, and for the folks listening through the draw string in your blinds?”
Readers by now will be familiar with Anwar’s early financing at some level – the Wahhabis became his foremost financial backers, and remain so to this day. The devil, as they say, is in the details, and the details are remarkable.

By the mid-1980s, it had become obvious that Wan Azizah had brought more than love and devout faith into her marriage to Anwar. She had also brought a spine of steel, more than a little ambition, and a great deal of wealth through her family’s substantial holdings.
His wife had provided much of the seed money for his political career, the Saudis the rest. Anwar’s net worth at the time was estimated – according to these American numbers – at roughly $35 million, a not insignificant sum in 1990. It would grow with time; most private estimates today put his family’s worth at roughly $4 billion.

Most of the papers I received that day were simply warming over much of what we already knew: The Saudis funded Anwar both directly and through the increasing number of third parties through which he was tied – universities, NGOs, and banks with significant ties to the man who, it was believed, would be Finance Minister within a year.
The growth came through some of the canniest and most blatantly corrupt financial dealings Malaysia has ever seen. He was always careful to leave the direct wealth accumulation in the hands of proxies in and out of Government – except in Bumiputra shares, an oversight that would cost him dearly at a critical time.
His involvement in Communist funding was more extensive than one would think, but we believed it was quite accidental – the Saudis had no love for the militant atheists in Moscow, and even less for the rival insurgents they had planted against the Saudis throughout the world. His name, his front companies, his personal banking arrangements – all arose more from his omnipresence than any sort of explicit association with the Russians.
But the new details were quite something to behold.
One name recurred again and again, one I’d not to that point seen connected to Anwar: Saleh Abdullah Kamel, one of the wealthiest men in Saudi Arabia. The Americans were some of the least trustful allies the Saudis had – quite the statement, to be sure – and they were diligent trackers of the wealthiest of the wealthy. Saleh Kamel had founded Al Baraka Bank, the largest source of Islamic finance in the world, and had generously spread his wealth around – with a catch.
His money went exclusively to Saudi proxies and their causes. Anwar was a direct recipient of a great deal of his largesse, and had been since his ABIM days. Saleh Kamel would become important again later in the I-Files, but at the time the extent of his fingerprint was already remarkable. Anwar’s radical charities in other countries, his charities here – all of which of course paid him some sort of management fee – and his every project at home received some amount of Saleh Kamel’s largesse.
All of this would be remarkable enough, but even then, those of us who did wetwork against the Soviets knew Al Baraka and Saleh Kamel from another source: He funded the mujahedeen in Afghanistan, or more accurately, the mujahedeen who truly believed in the Saudi vision. He funded the madrassas in Pakistan and the unreachable parts of Afghanistan that would birth the Taliban a mere handful of years later – even then, we were aware of some of the danger he posed.
Al Baraka would later be Osama bin Laden’s and al Qaeda’s first choice in banks, a fact that have never seemed to bother Anwar or Saleh Kamel – and certainly did not slow Anwar down from joining the board of Al Baraka on leaving prison. He even proudly boasts of it to this day.

Anwar understood the importance of maintaining a good relationship, and so worked to keep his patron happy. In 1994, while Finance Minister, Anwar privatised Bank Islam (which Anwar himself had founded), selling 2.89 million shares to Joint Arab Malaysian Investment, which already controlled 5.27 million shares. JAMI’s largest shareholders were Al Baraka and Saleh Kamel; Anwar’s longtime associate Kamaruddin Mohd Nor, several Saudi-controlled companies, and a handful of Anwar front groups were the remaining major shareholders. JAMI saw hundreds of millions off of the deal through off-books transactions.
As Finance Minister, Anwar always made certain that Al Baraka and Saleh Kamel received their share – they, and a mysterious figure we would come to know as ‘Mr Ten Per Cent.’
The relationship has always been symbiotic. Anwar has over the years taken “consulting fees” for “introducing” foreign firms to Al Baraka and other Saudi enterprises; for example, in the last decade, he took $25,000,000 from the Hong Kong firm Pearl Oriental to “solicit investments” from Al Baraka.
It’s good to be the king; or, failing that, the Finance Minister.

There was more, and it filled in more gaps that we’d never imagined existed from Anwar’s early days. Ahmad al-Haj Totonji, the Iraqi who had apparently brokered Saudi funds to Anwar during his ABIM days, and Dr Abdul Hamid A Sulayman, his superior – and Anwar’s appointment as second Rector of the International Islamic University Malaysia – helped fund Anwar’s first American project, the International Institute of Islamic Thought. The Institute was not only a way for Anwar to help internationalise Saudi teachings under the cover of working with the more moderate factions of the Muslim Brotherhood, it was also a channel for Saudi funds into Anwar’s coffers.
The IIIT would be a money channel for funds to pour into other groups and enterprises Anwar controlled through surrogates over the decades. Over tea and spread manila folders in 1999, some colleagues and I estimated he’d made somewhere on the order of £30 million off of IIIT’s several ventures, in funds nominally dedicated to spreading a moderate and tolerant version of Islam.

By now, Anwar’s closet extremism and his Saudi ties were no surprise; his ties to the advocates of violent jihad, however, were a bit jarring. The files also suggested that the Saudis had taught Anwar the value not merely of front companies, but of dealing with banks who could be trusted to be discreet, and who could maintain anonymous accounts indefinitely. The size of those accounts was an outright mystery.

We eventually learned the size of some of those accounts. By the time Anwar made his putsch attempt on Mahathir, he apparently held roughly RM3 billion in Bank Negara, through proxy accounts and straw holder accounts – a neat little trick he’d learned from the Saudis, who hold so much of their wealth in Asian and, until recently, Swiss banks through dummy corporation after dummy corporation. Although we had some inklings before Abdul Murad’s statutory declaration just after Anwar’s fall, the sheer scope of Anwar’s holdings in Malaysia simply stunned us all as much as it did Mahathir.
We’d thought we had him pinned down, but there he was drawing down tens of millions of ringgits at a time underneath everyone’s nose. More importantly – as we would later discover – Anwar had used those very accounts to create the network of public relations consulting agencies that would later rally to his side after his downfall.

But that is getting ahead of the story a bit.
Though much of this was an open secret in KL at some level, Mahathir was absolutely blind to it.
He was still fighting his internal battles, and Operation Lalang had damaged both the Barisan Nasional coalition and Mahathir’s attention to his own Cabinet. It seemed beyond dispute that he was relying more and more on Anwar – faithful Anwar, who’d stayed with Umno Team A, who had become the perfect party man – to reliably keep doing whatever it was he was doing. Mahathir was too busy doing a march through the institutions and repairing his coalition to notice the corruption and extremism developing just beneath his nose. Or perhaps he did not wish to see it.
One place where money was already flowing was the new administrative capital, for which Mahathir had selected a choice spot in Selangor. Mahathir would later boast of the extent to which planning, materials, design, construction, and waste removal were handled by companies domestic to Malaysia. The files made clear that Anwar intended that his own, and his patrons’, companies would be those domestic corporations.
Anwar’s time in Government was therefore both a blend of cronyism and radical Islam, and a level of corruption and profit-taking from the public on a scale that would shame a lesser man. But then, Anwar never thought himself a lesser man, which is perhaps why he always seems so surprised when challenged in public.

But in the 1990s, Anwar intended to be the indispensable man, more than Mahathir had ever imagined being. And he was well on his way.
That, in turn, led to Petronas.
Roughly a month later, I was puttering about the office, trying to determine if I was needed that day or not. The tremendous advantage to being the boss is that one need only ask oneself permission to check out for the day; the tremendous disadvantage is that one rarely gives oneself permission.
This was shaping up to be one of the exceptions. Like most new fathers, I was convinced that my son had reinvented the fact of infancy, and his every movement was a delight. We were trying him on solids, and I was inclined to see him spit up first-hand. I called in my most senior subordinate to hand off some tasks.
By the time Phillip entered, I was already mentally on the walk home. I motioned for him to sit and opened my mouth when he uncharacteristically intruded.
“Sir,” he began, his American upbringing showing. Half-Chinese, half-Welsh-French-Something American mix, I suspected he’d be supplanting me in this operation soon. No matter. Today he was my excuse to depart early. “Have you seen the latest data on Petronas?”
This was quite the last thing I’d expected him to say, so I reached across the desk to receive the folder he was handing me. I opened it up and resigned myself to being around a bit longer. I read, reviewed the graphs, stopped on the second page, backed up, started again, and finished. I closed the folder and looked up.
“What are they doing with the money?” I asked. Piercing through the financial gobbledygook, graphs, charts, and formulae was a single conclusion: Petronas was apparently selling a small part of its oil at a price well below market. Not all, not most, and unless one was running intelligence on the biggest companies in Malaysia, not enough to notice.
Phillip had noticed. Bright lad. However, he was as puzzled as I. “Not sure, chief. A lot of state oil companies use this as a way to take assets off the books. They allow majors to take the oil at a low price, sell at a good markup, split the difference with the state oil company, and the state concern gets to book a loss and take an off-books profit at the same time.
“Thing is, this is so small. It’s barely worth the trouble. It’s almost like they’re running a pilot operation, trying to see if they can manage this without getting caught.”
They?” I asked. “Is ‘they’ Petronas or some of its executives?”
He frowned. “I’m not sure,” he said, tasting the words as they left his mouth. “Without better contacts inside, I’m not certain there’s any way to tell.”
I steepled my fingers and thought for a moment. The sun was shining, the weather was unusually pleasant, and I had a beautiful wife and baby at home. Phillip had a young wife who was expecting, too. Most of my team either had families or were auditioning for the process.
“Close the office for today,” I announced. “Petronas isn’t going anywhere, the difference in the list price and the spot price won’t change, and we need a break.” I stood up, grinning, and practically raced home, feeling like a schoolboy let out early.
By itself, that episode apparently had little to do with Anwar; I tell it because like so many of the stories in the “I” Files, it would take later data to understand how it all tied together.
Friends of Anwar from his university and ABIM days had a way of entering into important positions in Government, state-owned industry, or private industry with Government contracts.
Over a decade later, I would discover Petronas apparently doing the same thing, but on a larger scale, never bothering to identify its rationale, and unwilling or unable to explain what happened to the difference or why they were using an under-market pricing method.
Digging to the bottom of that yielded more Anwar Ibrahim.

Another name would later be added to these files. Hassan Marican, who was in 1990 a rising star in Petronas, drew an enormous number of foreign intelligence reports. He’d been recruited there by Basir Ismail (Chairman of Petronas at the time, and a close confidant of Dr M) just a short time before, and was already making waves – and clearly aiming for the Presidency, then occupied by Azizan Zainul Abidin.

Hassan’s rise mirrored Anwar’s rise – if the files are to be believed, not coincidentally. Hassan’s father had been one of Wan Azizah’s father’s colleagues in Psy-Ops in the 1970s. Hassan had attended Malay College, a scant five years Anwar’s junior there, and had walked into the network Anwar developed. Anwar and Hassan worked hand-in-glove to engineer Hassan’s rise up the ranks. By 1995, they had engineered Basir’s retirement, moving Azizan into the position of Chairman. The petrochemical group naturally needed a President and CEO, and so Anwar proposed Hassan.
Mahathir was uncertain – Hassan was only 43 at the time – but by then, the old man trusted his Deputy Prime Minister implicitly, and so agreed to the appointment.

Hassan therefore had full rein on Petronas’s coffers – and, more importantly, its operations. The trickle of underpriced crude Phillip had noticed expanded significantly and almost immediately, and all of our intelligence indicated that the missing money was being directed to Wahhabi and radical causes. As time went by, numerous intelligence services, including the Americans, developed credible information that Petronas – which had numerous Anwar allies and friends in its upper echelons – was diverting funds to Anwar front groups at home and abroad.

But the files told a bigger story. Price fixing was only the cleverest of the schemes the two MCKK men worked up together. Anwar cronies and vassals received the choicest construction, development, procurement, and service contracts from Petronas – billions of pounds’ worth.
Between them, they almost singlehandedly created what amounted to an oil mafia, a source of constant graft and kickbacks to fund Anwar’s war chest and to help him in his drive for Mahathir’s seat.
All of this had the effect of diverting untold billions in revenue and savings from Malaysia’s crown jewel – and source of so much public money. For all of the file material on this matter, for all of the several pages of graphs and analysis, there is no indication that either man lost a night’s sleep over this.

Hassan was an interesting fellow in his own right. A frequent and open lover of alcohol – he was regularly observed nursing a tall draught of beer at the Long Bar of the members-only Royal Selangor Club – he was prone to let the wrong word slip with a bit too much beer in him.
More than once, he’d talk about his close relationship with Anwar – and with Mahathir – and of holding both men’s affections as hedges against the other. There is a reason that he supported Mahathir’s various pet projects aside from the enormous kickback system he and Anwar developed – Proton, Putrajaya, the acquisition/bailout of Mahathir’s son Mirzan’s disaster of Konsortium Perkapalan, all because he was determined to ride both men’s coattails as long as possible.
It was only when Najib Razak became Prime Minister and summarily engineered Hassan’s removal from Petronas that this enormous source of funds would stop flowing to Anwar.

Whether all of this was true or not was – when I first heard of Petronas’s price fixing – not my concern, but in toto, it completed a web of funding that explained how Anwar, who had had so much taken from him after his fall, was immediately able to resume his old lifestyle at home and abroad much later, in 2004.

Thus, the story of Anwar is much like the story of a spider and its web – always adding a strand here, tending a strand there. Like his patrons the Wahhabis, he learned early the importance of taking the long view, and developing contingencies and protectors. It is thus that he began cultivating foreigners – especially Americans of both major political parties – and thus that the next chapter begins.

Excerp from the  I Files

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Dari UTP Sri Iskandar ke Toronto

Hari ini heboh mengatakan pelajar University Teknologi Petronas menipu Utusan Malaysia dalam ruang Khabar Dari Perantauan.

Gambar yang diedit dengan latar belakang taman di luar negara dihantar ke Utusan sebagai memberi salam kepada ibu bapa.

Mungkin ada yang mengutuk perbuatan pelajar tersebut. Tetapi ingatlah bahawa jika kita tak handle isu ini dengan baik maka omongan nakal pelajar ini akan menjadi kebencian.

Sebagai bekas pelajar luar negara yang belajar di Kanada dan juga sebagai ibu yang kebetulan mempunyai anak yang belajar di UTP saya dapat selami apa yang berlaku.

Saya juga sebenarnya jelek dengan salam dan gambar yang saya agak membanggakan diri dikirim lewat dada akhbar. Seingat saya, kami pelajar di Kanada lewat tahun 1980-an tak pernah hantar gambar ucapan Selamat Hari Raya ke mana mana dada akhbar semasa belajar di luar negara dulu. Jadi saya faham jika pelajar UTP jelek dengan tingkah laku kawan mereka yang belajar di luar negara.

Selain itu, perlu diingatkan, kemasukan pelajar ke UTP adalah melalui saringan. Keputusan SPM yang baik belum tentu meluluskan pelajar ke UTP jika tak disaring melalui ujian IQ, EQ dan interview- entrance exam sepertimana university ivy league negara luar.

Malah ada diantara kawan mereka di sekolah berasrama penuh yang gagal ke  UTP dapat pula biasiswa lain terutamanya JPA untuk belajar ke luar negara, sedangkan mereka ini dapat biasiswa Petronas dan syarikat minyak lain, kekal belajar di UTP, IPT terbaik negara ini.

Malah kalau ikut ranking bersama kawan mereka yang kebanyakannnya dari sekolah berasrama penuh, mereka ini lebih handal dari segi akademik berbanding kawan yang ke luar negara atas biasiswa agensi lain.

Bukan menjadi rahsia lagi di kalangan ibu bapa pilihan utama ialah ke  UTP di kalangan pelajar terbaik berbanding pilihan ke luar negara.Ini kerana pada tahun 3 dan 4, berbondon syarikat minyak menemuduga mereka untuk pengambilan pekerja.

Dengan itu mereka memberi momokan kpd pelajar luar negara yang pada mereka adalah lebih inferior dari segi akademik berbanding mereka.

Jadi jika kita tidak handle dengan baik cream of the cream pelajar Bumiputera ini, maka kita akan kehilangan mereka. Pelajar UTP juga mis-informed dengan apa yang berlaku dalam politik negara. Ada baiknya penceramah BTN di bawa ke UTP untuk menjelaskan keadaan sebenar.

Saya juga dah biasa menjawab soalan yang diutarakan oleh kawan anak saya yang berasal dari luar negara mengenai Malaysia.
Mungkin mereka mahir dalam sains dan teknologi tapi mereka kurang ilmu dari segi sejarah, perlembagaan negara dan kenapa wujudnya Artikel 153 dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan.Mereka tak tahu bahawa ianya perlu dibaca bersama artikel 3, 4 ,11, 157,159  serta artikel lain yang menekankan Islam sebagai ugama rasmi,Bahasa Melayu bahasa rasmi negara, peranan Raja Raja Melayu, Jus Soli dan pengorbanan Melayu terima lebih 1 juta rakyat China dan India pada 12 malam 1957 , 53 tahun yang lalu dan implikasi ke atas populasi Malaysia.

Sejarah perlu dibacakan dan difahamkan kepada mereka.
























Monday, May 3, 2010

"It insults the intelligence of us adults" for PETRONAS to appoint Sheryll Stothard

......"it insults the intelligence of us adults", to appoint Sheryll Stothard as PETRONAS GM.!

PLEASE READ BELOW AN EXCERPT OF HER MASTERPIECE......looks like a sleeper is being appointed as head of Petronas..what is this single act of defiance and stupidity says about the present CEO Shamsul? I do cry and yearn for Tan Sri Hassan Merican  to be back at Petronas!. taken from this  link or here  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anwarxtpm/message/9758

.....................................................................



I have received a good response for the earlier "article question" what if........,this e-mail(not edited) from Sheryll Stothard has given a outline of the Plans of the Current opposition Barisan Keadilan of thier model of governing Malaysia.



I belive this information must be shared in the of name democracy with others,ensuring that all Malaysia( at least the 2 million over who have internet capable e-mail accounts).

Note :i chose to even have keep the demeaning insults thrown at me in this message,the problem of most of the readers are the never read the whole message.Shelly you assumed I am pro Barisan Nasional(first the doctor, now you),I asure you i have no resources for such romantic ideas of being aligned to any political party.I am a CRITIC and i will criticise anyone who says one and does two.I want good things for my fellow country men.I asure you i neither have the time or money to be a active political member of any political party.


Anyway I have to admit i am at the kindegarten,when it comes writting.Looks like i have so much to learn about writting.


-----Original Message-----


From: Sheryll Stothard


To: jowhar


Cc: Bala Pillai ; Charles Hector ; cia991@... ; doimoi98@... ; firaun_2020@... ; fM_Bulletin ; Forum Rakyat ; Kris ; mahazalimtwo@... ; Rajen/Stef ; Reformist ; Sastera Malaysia ; sayapkanan@...


Date: Thursday, 8 July 1999 10:07


Subject: Re: What If ...DR please read..

Jowhar,

If you're sincerely concerned, please do check out the manifestos of the opposition parties to find out what you'll get with the alternative coalition.






Here are some highlights (that transcend Anwar's personal well-being):


1. An immediate stop to privatisation of basic public services like healthcare, education - and a reverse in even energy and public utilities. The rakyat will then regain control over these crucial areas and be able to stop corporate monopolies and forced price hikes. If you count the amount of money the rakyat will save, you'll see the benefits in this. Also, why the hell do we pay tax for, if not to pay for these basic services? According to the BN, our tax money is for social welfare for corporations. Do your math - a lot of M'sians have done so already and are awake to the fact that we're being taken for a very expensive ride by the BN.


2. An immediate separation of powers between the executive, the legislative and the judiciary to ensure accountability and avoid the abuse of power by any of these branches on the others. The executive (read: Dr M and gang) has been abusing the legislative and the judiciary so long that it thinks that this is a right, not a wrong. It's so bad that even Anwar, who belonged to the highest echelons of the executive, couldn't right this wrong. This means that the only alternative is to sack the present executive branch (read: BN) and elect new representatives.


3. A beginning of a new, more equitable, multiracial approach to managing this wonderful country called Malaysia. Our citizens are relatively tolerant of each other, but the BN has continued the British divide-and-rule (and outdated) system of government in keeping us apart. After putting up with this for 42 years, you must agree that the only way from here is to look at alternatives to the status quo. We have to UPGRADE.


4. A real and committed plan to alleviate poverty, esp. among the Malay rural community which has been used and abused by Umno for far too long. The Anwar issue has only been a catalyst to the expression of dissatisfaction among Malays, not the over-riding reason to voice a need for change. To claim so is disingenuous.


5. A stronger government to take Malaysia into the challenging new millennium. The BN can't do it - it's quite obvious. Even their leaders admit so, blaming external forces for their failure. Blaming is not going to solve our problems as a small trading nation in a corporate-ruled world. Having a clear and consistent policy on managing our assets will help stave off the sharks when they come to feed here. Eg., if privatisation is reversed, even the WTO will not have jurisdiction on our assets. When you put our assets in the hands of a few private corporations, you leave these assets vulnerable to takeover from within and outside the country, esp when these corporations mismanage our assets. Will BN reverse privatisation? I seriously doubt it! So who will? The opposition, of course.


6. We'll be better participants in the international and regional scene. Look around you - change is sweeping the region with such a ferocity, esp in Thailand and indonesia. Take Indonesia, for example. After the dust settles, and there is a new government, who do you think they'll want to deal with here in Malaysia? Dr M? Forget it - his name is dirt in Jakarta. Ghafar Baba? Tengku Razaleigh? Dream on! Ideology aside, and put into your crude economic terms, Indonesia is a market of 200 million people, just next to us - we cannot afford to screw up our relations with them by having the BN represent us!! We need to keep up with world standards - at the moment, democracy is an extremely sellable concept - we need it not just for ourselves, but for our relations with other countries. Or else the only country that'll give us the time of day will be Myanmar! (actually the generals there aren't going to last very long, so even that's not compelling enough). What will this mean? WE WILL BE INTERNATIONAL PARIAHS. If you can live with that, go ahead and keep the present BN status quo. But don't mock those who are more sensible than you.






If you need to argue for the BN, engage the opposition on worthy issues. If you want to engage with the adults, drop your kindergarten histrionics. Or else, stay in the playground with the likes of Dr M, Ling Liong Sik, Lim Keng Yaik and, of course, the biggest baby of all, Samy Vellu. We adults prefer to concentrate on the real problems facing the country, not deal with politicians like those who obviously need to grow up. You say that "governing a nation is not a joke". We are aware of it - so why don't you go tell this to those juvenile delinquents in BN instead, seeing that they've turned Malaysia into a joke already? Why be wary about treading on the toes of the BN, when you feel quite free to take cheap shots at the opposition? I seriously suspect that you really don't want to leave the kindergarten, Jowhar. So don't throw around concepts like 'democracy' so cheaply and insincerely in this forum while citing historical revolutions in the West to back up your scare tactics, parroting your playmates in the BN - it insults the intelligence of us adults.


Cheers


Sheryll Stothard



Saturday, May 1, 2010

Ingatan Untuk Datuk Seri Najib-Eksplorasi Minyak Luar Negara Urusan Kerajaan Malaysia

Sedeh apabila Ayah Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad bercakap pasal Malaysian Generosity dalam artikel mutakhirnya di Che Det.

Sedeh sebab sebagai bekas Perdana Menteri, Ayah Tun tentu merasai apa yang dirasai oleh sebilangan besar kakitangan Petronas sekarang. Ramai yang tak tahu bahawa di zaman Ayah Tun, Petronas masuk mencarigali minyak di negara luar sebagai Government To Government Joint Venture. Oleh itu kerja kerja eksplorasi dan carigali minyak mudah sebab Petronas ada support dari Kerajaan Malaysia.

Di zaman Tun Lah, Petronas terkial-kial masuk sebagai syarikat eksplorasi minyak asing. Tidak ada back up dari Kerajaan Malaysia. Akibatnya, Petronas "kalah" dalam tender dengan syarikat minyak asing yang mendapat back up sepenuhnya dari kerajaan mereka, contoh yang nyata ialah China Oil -taktik yang dipelajari dari Malaysia.

Akibatnya Petronas dikenakan banyak regulasi asing seperti perlu menyertakan sejumlah peratusan kakitangan dari negara tersebut, sedangkan China Oil, tukang masakpon dibawa dari China!

Di kala gawat politik di sesebuah negara, Petronas terpaksa bertindak proaktif menyelamatkan nyawa kakitangannya, dalam drill evakuasi seperti yang dijalankan di negara Sudan, Turkmenistan  dan sebagainya. Hanya kerana reputasi Petronas gah maka Petronas dan kakitangannya terselamat dari menjadi mangsa kacau bilau keadaan politik yang tak stabil di negara tersebut. Kasihanilah syarikat minyak negara yang membawa pulangan matawang asing dan keuntungan berbillion atas operasi bahayanya di negara frontier!

Tambahan teruk lagi eksplorasi minyak di negara yang menjadi sekutu atau  koloni tak rasmi Amerika Syarikat seperti Iraq dikenakan syarat membeli sejumlah 20% peralatan dan teknologi dari Amerika Syarikat!

Inilah selok belok pengurusan minyak yang perlu diketahui oleh Datuk Seri Najib. Seeloknya juga Kerajaan Malaysia memasukkan Petronas dalam semua delegasi Governement To Government di semua negara asing-balik ke zaman Ayah Tun Dr. Mahathir. Jangan lupa setiap delegasi perlukan feedback Petronas -jangan jadi pisang berbuah 2 kali dalam kes blok L dan M, di persisiran perairan Miri , Sarawak!

Baca petikan STAR hari ini , yang disertakan sebagai ulasan kepada pendedahan Che Det:-

Petronas has been invited by the government of Brunei to enter into an agreement to develop the two blocks of oil rich areas in the South China Sea on a commercial arrangement basis.

In a statement here on Saturday, the national oil company said it had since set up a team that had begun negotiations with Brunei to work out the terms of this commercial arrangement.

"Both parties are committed to arriving at a mutually beneficial arrangement as soon as possible," it said.

Petronas said it also wished to clarify reports on the offshore exploration areas designated as Blocks L and M following the execution of the Exchange of Letters between Malaysia and Brunei on March 16, 2009.


"This exchange was a culmination of a long-standing issue between the two countries to arrive at a mutually beneficial arrangement, which allowed Petronas to enter into new production sharing contracts for both blocks.

"Petronas confirms that following the exchange of letters, the production sharing contracts covering Blocks L and M, which were awarded in 2003 to Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd and Murphy Sabah Oil Co Ltd were formally terminated on April 7 this year as these are no longer part of Malaysia.


"Blocks L and M are redesignated as Blocks CA1 and CA2 respectively," it said.


The controversy over the two blocks have arisen after former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had in a blog posting asked why the two blocks no longer belonged to Malaysia.

Dr Mahathir said the two blocks had been claimed by Malaysia based on historical facts.


In response, former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had refuted claims that he signed away Malaysia's rights over the two blocks.


Abdullah had said that he signed the agreement after the Malaysian Cabinet approved the deal on Feb 11, which stated that while sovereign rights over these two areas belonged to Brunei, it also allowed Malaysia to participate in jointly developing the areas for 40 years.

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Petronas oil reserves on foreign shores!


Think hard, think smart.....the majority of Petronas oil reserves are on foreign soil err in land -locked earth last frontiers like Turkmenistan, Sudan and soon to be Iraq.
Ehmm to be a truly multinational company, Petronas has been developing her people resources steadily over the years.
To Hassan Merican and the team, congratulations.
To Tun Dr. Mahathir, thank you for leaving Petronas alone all through out your premiership.
To would be corporate marauders, be careful, for you are looking at highly expert team with multi nationalities here.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Harvard Business Review-grooming CEO from internal talent

The case of CEO hunting for many GLCs especially Petronas, the National Oil Company cum errr national coffers, continues to interest many readers. But what is all the clamour about picking up the successor for a very capable Hassan Marican. Hassan Merican was a good example of an outside talent groomed internally to later suceeded Tan Sri Azizan Zainul Abidin as CEO of Petronas. Tan Sri Azizan remained the Chairman for Petronas until his demise in 2003.

myKMU and STAR offer good insight on what makes a good CEO here http://www.mykmu.net/modules.php?name=News&file=categories&op=newindex&catid=1 and here http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/9/5/business/4647792&sec=business .

Another notable notes of a good CEO was opined by none other than Petronas young Turks, Tengku Razaleight Hamzah in MCOBA blog

While
Idris Jala (now Datuk) was headhunted from outside, Idris Jala was a breath of fresh air much needed by MAS. Idris was a well rounded and highly capable manager for Shell and well versed in the ever changing price of crude oil. With Idris at the helm of MAS, the company was able to hedge operation funds mostly against the ever inconsistent oil prices, the fuel much needed by MAS and other airlines .....and in the process make some good turn around for MAS.

Maybe, this article from Harvard Business Review fits here. In the nutshell it is suffice to say that, paper qualification alone is not the main prerequisite for being picked up as CEO of one of the best managed companies in the world (Fortune 500). The would-be CEO shall be a person who has proven track record. As one anonymous commentators said, in one of the forums, definitely not young cikus with mere paper qualifications...oppps, I do hope I do not rattle off somebody else nerve!

Excerpt from Harvard Business Review;-

Solve the Succession Crisis by Growing Inside-Outside Leaders

Should companies needing a new CEO pick someone from inside or outside? Insiders know the firm and its people, but they're often blind to the need for radical change. Outsiders see the need for change, but don't know the company well enough to foster it.

Fortunately, says Bower, firms don't have to compromise. Companies delivering superior, sustained performance--P&G, IBM, GE--have inside-outsiders at the helm. These CEOs have ascended within the organization while remaining detached enough from its cultural norms to maintain an outsider's objectivity. They know the firm but also understand how it will have to change. They're able to look at the organization as if they just bought the company.

Growing inside-outsiders takes patience. Over a decade or more, your firm must groom high-potential executives through increasingly challenging assignments and rigorous mentoring. But the effort pays big dividends: Your company has access to an able CEO--whenever it needs one.

The Idea in Practice

How Companies Grow Inside-Outsider Leaders

Recruit right. Hire from a diverse pool of individuals who are highly talented in their area of specialization and who have general-manager potential. Over time, they'll become good insiders--learning to manage in the context of the company's strategy, systems, and culture.

Identify insiders blessed with an outside view. Often, they come from outside the organization's mainstream; for example, spending extensive time away from headquarters.

Before becoming CEO, Procter & Gamble's A. G. Lafley spent years in Asia building P&G's Chinese operation--and working in beauty products rather than its core detergent business. His resulting broad view of P&G's potential likely laid the foundation for the series of acquisitions that have substantially expanded P&G's business' reach.

Groom potential inside-outsiders. Hand them increasingly complex assignments that ready them to manage a whole business as early as possible. If you're a one-business company, identify distinct units--such as geographical regions with markedly different competitive conditions--that promising inside-outsiders can run.

Mentor. Assign senior managers to oversee inside-outsiders' development. These mentors help protégés extract lessons from each assignment, such as learning how to ratchet up growth while still delivering current performance. Mentors also ensure that there are adequate (but not excessive) resources for protégés to turn new ideas into great businesses.

How You Can Become an Inside-Outsider

Pick the right employer. Look for companies that will provide a clear career path, mentoring, challenging assignments with enough time to learn from them, early general management responsibility, and chances to try out new ideas.

Prove yourself on the job. Meet your numbers, help your peers, and develop your direct reports. When bringing problems to your boss, also suggest solutions. Cultivate a group of senior-manager friends who back your ideas with resources.

Broaden your view. Network with people outside your division and company, including customers, vendors, related organizations, and union leaders. Expand your general knowledge beyond your immediate business through seminars and out-of-mainstream experiences.

Solicit unvarnished truths. The higher you rise in your organization, the more people will tell you only what they think you want to hear. So cultivate a relationship with someone--spouse, close friend, mentor--who tells you the truths you don't want to hear.

Copyright 2007 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

.................................................................................................................................................................

dipetik dari myKMU blog
Perlu ada polisi pemilihan CEO yang jelas sebagai panduan

Akhir-akhir ini pemilihan Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif (CEO) sesebuah syarikat khususnya syarikat kaitan kerajaan (GLC) sudah menjadi suatu perkara yang dibincangkan terbuka oleh umum dan dilaporakan oleh media, baik perdana mahu pun alternatif.

Ada yang hanya membuat tekaan untuk menunjukkan kebolehan membuat ramalan. Ada perbincangan tersirat bertujuan untuk melobi. Selalu juga didengar mereka yang menimbulkan isu atas hujah-hujah tertentu agar seseorang itu tidak patut dilantik.

Menteri yang berkenaan atau Perdana Menteri kelihatan sedia mendengar timbal balik yang ikhlas dari media dan menghargai dengan tidak memilih nama-nama yang dipersoalkan kewibawaan. Ini seiring dengan apa yang disarankan Perdana Menteri supaya sedia mendengar dan Menteri tidak ada jawapan kepada segala-galanya.

Apa sekali pun timbal balik yang diberi, kuasa prerogatif tersebut masih terletak kepada Menteri yang berkenaan atau Perdana Menteri dan ianya memang perlu dihormati. Namun begitu, ada baiknya suatu polisi yang menggariskan kriteria CEO GLC dibuat sebagai panduan pemilihan dan diketahui pihak-pihak yang berkenaan. Bagi mengelakkan pemilihan CEO sering jadi perbincangan umum, kriteria am dan khusus untuk pemilihan dijadikan satu polisi yang telus dan difahami, baik dalam organisasi atau media.

Sesuatu syarikat mengalami masaalah atau keperluan tertentu untuk sesuatu masa dan fasa dalam kitaran hidup korporat (corporate lifecycle). Kriteria untuk memilih seorang CEO itu perlu menyesuaikan latarbelakang dari segi pencapaian, pengalaman, dan kepakaran dengan keadaan syarikat dan suasana ia berada.

Tentu sekali syarikat yang berupa syarikat pembangunan tidak boleh diketuai oleh seorang dari pengalaman logistik. Seorang konsultan yang lebih berpengalaman dalam menjana polisi awam dan khidmat nasihat pengurusan khusus tidak bolehlah diletakkan pada kedudukan teratas sebagai CEO.

Jawatan CEO memerlukan seorang yang perlu ada pengalaman mengurus, implementasi polisi dan berupaya memahami masaalah operasi.

Pengurus yang pernah mengepalai syarikat dalam keadaan fasa pertumbuhan pesat tidak semestinya sesuai untuk mengurus syarikat yang mengalami konsolidasi atau fasa perubahan struktur dan proses atau syarikat baru mula (start-up).

CEO yang paling sesuai untuk mengepalai sesuatu syarikat haruslah seseorang yang berlatarbelakang dalam kegiatan utama syarikat. Umpamanya kontraktor harus dikepalai oleh seorang berlatarbelakang jurutera. Syarikat penerbangan dikepalai oleh seorang yang berlatarbelakang dalam aeroangkasa.

Kadangkala jika syarikat itu sedang mengalami proses perubahan untuk mengatasi masaalah yang diluar kepakaran kegiatan utama, maka CEO yang sesuai tidak semestinya dari latarbelakang sedemikian.

Umpamamnya hospital sesuai dikepalai oleh seorang doktor. Namun begitu doktor itu harus mempunyai pengalaman dan kepakaran mengurus dan mentadbir organisasi. Adakala apabila cabaran yang dihadapi hospital untuk menstruktur operasi untuk viabiliti jangkamasa panjang atau menjana dana untuk memperluaskan operasi, latarbelakang yang sesuai mungkin semestinya seorang doktor.

Kadangkala seperti syarikat penerbangan, latarbelakang aeroangkasa saja tidak mencukupi kerana ia perlu dipadankan dengan kepakaran khusus. Jika syarikat tersebut baru distruktur kembali kewangan dan organisasi, ia memerlukan seorang yang boleh memperkemaskan operasi. CEO dari seorang berlatarbelakang kewangan, atau pemasaran atau sumber manusia tentu tidak sesuai.

CEO perlu seseorang yang fokus dalam memberi kepimpinan kepada organisasi. Tentu sekali seorang aktivis politik mungkin tidak sesuai. Selain itu, ia menimbulkan syak akan ada salahguna kuasa dan kemudahan syarikat. Dalam suasana politik hari ini, ini perlu dihindarkan.

Sebagai pemimpin organisasi, CEO perlulah seorang yang berperibadian yang boleh memimpin, dihormati dan berupaya memberi keyakinan kepada pekerja-pekerja seluruh organisasi. Keperibadian yang sombong tidak menarik sokongan dan hormat dari pengurus dan pekerja di bawahnya. CEO yang bertanggungjawab dan ikhlas tentu dapat memberi semangat yang positif kepada organisasi.

Seringkali, resume seseorang itu tidak mencukupi untuk mengenali kesesuaian seseorang calun itu. Prestasi lepas yang tidak meyakinkan atau rekod buruk tidak boleh tidak diambilkira. Satu kajian pemeriksaan latarbelakang calun perlu dilakukan dengan mengumpul maklumat dari mereka-mereka dalam industri, rakan dan pesaing dan pelbagai sumber-sumber.

Penting sekali agar CEO sesebuah GLC itu mempunyai pemahaman dan pemikiran sosio-politikal atau sosio-ekonomi serta sikap yang patriotik kepada kepentingan negara dan awam. Walaupun tanggungjawab CEO adalah kepada stakeholders atau mereka yang berkepentingan kepada syarikat, mereka perlu ada sedikit sebanyak roh perjungan atau sikap keprihatinan dalam sentiasa mengambilkira kepentingan negara dan rakyat.

Paling penting sekali, CEO perlu teguh nilai moral supaya berpegang kepada amalan pengurusan yang beretika dan timbang rasa kemanusiaan. Mereka bukan saja tidak disabitkan dengan jenayah rasuah tetapi bersih dari desas desus yang berunsur rasuah.

Kriteria pemilihan CEO sebenarnya boleh disimpulkan dalam slogan yang kita biasa dengar suatu masa dahulu tetapi sudah hilang dimakan masa ia-itu
Bersih Cekap Amanah.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

rezeki dari Allah hendaklah ditadbir urus dengan sebaik mungkin

Isu minyak di luar persisiran pantai Kelantan terus menghantui orang orang yang tamak haloba

Petronas sebagai sebuah syarikat minyak negara telah mentadbir urus dengan sebaik mungkin sumber minyak negara.

Petronas telah berlaku adil dengan memberikan royalti minyak kepada negeri negeri yang berhak mendapat royalti iaitu Sabah dan Sarawak. Ini kerana di Sarawak, telaga minyak digali pada persisiran pantai iaitu di Baram Delta ( di Miri) dan Bintulu . Malah seluruh dunia mengetahui bahawa Baram Delta adalah pengeluar minyak utama di dunia. Begitu juga dunia mengenali Bintulu Light Oil yang digunakan dalam engin jet kapalterbang kerana minyaknya amat berkualiti tinggi akibat kandungan sulfurnya amat rendah.....

Begitu juga sejajar dengan dasar dasar Akta Petroleum Negara, bagi negeri negeri yang telaga minyaknya tersasar jauh dari persisiran pantai dan tak layak dapat wang royalty, diberi juga wang ehsan..untuk memajukan negeri. Negeri yang jatuh dalam kategori ini adalah Terengganu dan baru baru ini Kelantan


Negeri ini diberikan juga wang ehsan walaupon telaga minyaknya didapati melebihi 3 batu nautika dari pesisiran pantai
....................................................................................................................

Kewajiban menguruskan dengan baik amanah rezeki yang dikurniakan Allah.

Baru baru ini heboh mengenai Kelantan yang mahukan wang royalty bukannya wang ehsan. Soalan utama layakkah Kelantan dapat wang royalty?

Jika ditanya pakar undang undang sekalipon Kelantan tak layak dapat wang royalty berdasarkan faktor di atas

Mungkin yang jadi kemarahan beberapa pihak pentadbiran tertinggi negeri Kelantan adalah kerana wang ehsan tersebut tidak dapat terus ke dalam poket mereka.

Umum mengetahui bahawa wang ehsan tersebut disalurkan melalui Kementerian Luar Bandar dan Desa untuk memajukan kemudahan infrastruktur (bazaar, rumah rakyat termiskin, jalan, klinik, sekolah ) dan pembangunan modal insan rakyat negeri Kelantan (program tadika KEMAS, program kesihatan rakyat menentang HIV/AIDS, penagihan dadah, keruntuhan moral, perbelanjaan asrama untuk anak yatim, program ibu tunggal, program pemulihan pelajar bermasalah, program bagi siswazah menganggur) dapat dilaksanakan dan dinikmati rakyat Kelantan secara terus.

Sudah cukuplah amanah rezeki yang diberikan melalui hasil balak Kelantan dipunggah dan dinikmati oleh kroni tertentu kepimpinan tertinggi negeri Kelantan. Kini sudah tiba giliran rakyat termiskin menikmati rezeki yang datangnya dari rahmat Allah.

Langkah pemberian wang ehsan untuk disampaikan secara terus kepada rakyat ini adalah langkah bijak kerana wang ehsan diberikan kerana rahmat Allah dan dizahirkan secara fizikal melalui ehsan kepimpinan DS Najib. Oleh itu wajar ianya ditadbir urus secara amanah dan jujur oleh setiap yang bergelar "insan".

Oleh itu saya amat berharap rakyat Kelantan nampak kewajaran memberikan wang ehsan ini melalui kementerian terbabit.

...........................................................................................................................................

seterusnya saya akan sambung dengan cerita sedeh dari Petronas dan kewajaran menghargai wang ehsan dan rezeki Allah ini kerana ianya pengorbanan pegawai -pegawai Petronas....Al Fatehah untuk rakan saya Allahyarham Mohamad Bin Mohamad Aris, pegawai Petronas yang meninggal dunia di Eritria dan pegawai Petronas lain yang meninggal dunia dalam menjalankan tugas untuk ugama, bangsa dan negara.