Sabah siege- circumtancial evidents that link to Anwar

The Sabah siege was planned carefully months before - these circumstancial evidents resurfaced recently.....linking "The One Power Hungry Person" recently named by The Nation Inquirer, Philippines HERE.

Proof from the homeland as the transcript of the video says:

" Tanya sama pokok apa sebab goyang" became "Tanya sama Najib apa sebab goyang....Nanti Najib jawab Sabah nak Hilang....Bila Sabah hilang, Barisan goyang, Najib jadi ketua pembangkang"

 

 

Circumtances evident in the  Tasaug/Sulu homeland

 

Facebooker Asree Sug  talked freely about Nur Misuari and Anwar link. Nur Misuari of MNLF is  linked in the Sulu Siege on Sabah.

 

 

 

The cronology of the event as published before:

 

Akhir Dec 2012 : Anwar Ibrahim Bertemu Nur Misuari Yg Juga Mantan Gabenor Mindano. Mohammad Kamal Saaid @ Manuel Karingal Amalilio Di Kehandaki Di Mindanao Kerana Skim Cepat Kaya Yg Menipu Warga Filipina 12 Billion Peso.

Januari 2013 : Anwar Ibrahim - Siri Jelajah Bertemu Dgn Pelajar Australia & Senator Bebas Bagi Menjadi Watch Dog BERSIH & PRU 13

17hb Januari 2013 Kapal Pemusnah USS Guardian Berlegar Di Laut Sulu - http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=71488

22hb Januari 2013 Amalilio atau nama sebenarnya, Mohammad Kamal Saaid merupakan individu paling dikehendaki di Filipina selepas terlibat penipuan skim cepat kaya membabitkan wang sebanyak RM895 juta. Media sebelum ini melaporkan Amalilio ditahan 22 Januari lepas di Ranau. Further report HERE

 

The damning evident from the meeting is this photo:

The Anwar -Misuari meeting in The Philippines

 

 

 

 

 

The attempted diversion by his "macai", another damning evident

 

 

What say you readers?

Ngeh rattles fundamental issue

Ngeh, thinking that his recent remarks on Prophet Muhammad PBUH was only light weight in blasphemy towards Islam, said that Malaysians should move on. I for one beg to differ.

May be Ngeh will learn the lesson faster when Muslims start to boycott his Ipoh White Coffee outlets.

 The blasphemy game  will never stop- he and his DAP cohorts are testing Muslims sensitivities on several issues. Apology is just a game because DAP realises that Malaysian Muslims are gullable and naive  !

In the recent Malaysian Insider interview he says Malaysians should focus on other important issues such as economy and social issues . Ngeh, the businessman behind Ipoh Old Town White Coffee, FORGETS that without  POLITICAL STABILITY- which is FUNDAMENTAL in any country,   the  community at large will not  support the much hyped economy.

This religious blasphemy and transgression on Islam in not the first for infamous cousins Ngeh and Ngah of Perak. They have transgressed the religious border before when they  recited the "holy surah Aura"  from their so called Koran-  Sadly the religious illiterate PAS supporters hailed the Ngeh-Ngah man made surah with takbeer. (there was no surah Aura in Quran )

May be Ngeh will be learn the lesson faster when Muslims boycott his Ipoh White Coffee outlets.

An interesting entry from Tan Sri Sanusi Junid on the political landscape in Malaysia- this article is an excerpt from his blog (in 2010) ; TSSJ dissected Raja Petra's opinion on Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan. Please take note that the political landscape in 2012 has changed. Back in 2008 voters simply  voted for Pakatan out of  protest for the previous premiership of Pak Lah. Has DS Najib been successful in maneuvering CHANGE WITHIN THE GOVERNMENT? Read on 

 

 

RAJA PETRA'S VIEWS ON 'IRRELEVANCY' ARE RELEVANT

1. I am impressed with the interview with Raja Petra by New Sunday Times journalist Ahmad Fairuz Othman at a hotel suite in Singapore which appears in the New Sunday Times of 1st January, 2012.

2. It was a good welcome message for the New Year.

3. I quote Raja Petra as published:

a) Even when Nelson Mandela went to jail for 27 years, there was no campaign to free Mandela. Even the Free Mandela Group was a campaign to end apartheid.

b) In Myanmar, it's about a political prisoner. It's about freeing a political prisoner.

c) But Anwar is being put on trial not on political grounds but on criminal grounds.

4. The Free Anwar campaign 901 (not to be read as 9/11) is therefore not the same as the Free Mandela campaign. Furthermore the judgement on Anwar has not been made.

5. It was further reported that Raja Petra said:

d) I have spoken to some people who were with him when he was in the government. They have pointed out what he did. And I asked him and they say, "You know, Anwar has his shortcomings.

e) Anwar has his skeletons in the closet. Yet you support the opposition. Their answer is, "What choice do we have". It all boils down to that. What choice do we have.

6. It is clear as we know that the voters were fed-up with the UMNO and Barisan Nasional leadership. But that was the leadership up to the General Election of 2008.

7. Raja Petra is reported to have also said that:

f) People support Anwar purely because they see him as the only alternative to what we have now.

8. But that was the sentiment as in the year 2008. Even Tun Dr. Mahathir, and a few others, left UMNO in protest against the leadership at that time.

9. Dato' Seri Najib is now the Prime Minister. He is different from his predecessor.

10. If it is the alternative that the voters are looking for then we could rephrase the above statement to read "(f) People support Anwar purely because they see him as the only alternative to Dato' Abdullah Ahmad Badawi".

11. The alternative to Dato' Abdullah Ahmad Badawi is now Dato' Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak.

12. Is Dato' Seri Najib a 'Winnable Candidate'. The answer is yes.

13. If the supporters of Anwar cling to him despite him having his 'shortcomings' ( as in 'd' ) and has 'skeletons in the cupboard' ( as in 'e' ), surely they can support Dato' Seri Najib, despite all criticisms thrown against him because someone wants his job.

14. Raja Petra is obviously a shrewd and brave observer. I follow his ideas in the blog and I met him three times in Manchester, once in Lotus Restaurant owned by a Malaysian lawyer. His daughter is a very successful landscaper and a friend of my daughter who is finishing her studies for a PhD in Architecture. I spent long hours with Pet even before he came out openly on the 'Altantuya' case. I knew about the untruths written in the media about him living in a luxurious bungalow in London. He lives in a terrace house in Manchester.

15. I admire Raja Petra's guts whatever his political views. I was taught by my boss Minister Tun Ghazalie Shafie when I deputise him in the Ministry of Home Affairs, that one should be open-minded and be able to interact with anybody even those whose views differ from yours.

16. Raja Petra compared the Pakatan Rakyat with the Liberal Democratic Party in Britain which he told me have done more in a shorter period even though it is only a minority coalition in the British Government.

17. Raja Petra, Anwar and I all studied at MCKK with different seniorities. We know one another well. I was glad when Raja Petra is reported to have said:

g) To me the issue of Anwar is not whether he is or not guilty with sodomy. The issue is whether he is the best person to run the country. Can he run the country? Now, you might be the most God-fearing man on earth; you can be absolutely clean. But if you cannot run the country you cannot run the country.'

18. Besides living on borrowed glory, permitted by Tun Dr. Mahathir Muhammad, I cannot remember Anwar doing anything good for the country, even those that have gone wrong or have failed. Kukrit Pramoj once said 'one need not do anything in order not to fail.' In that way one can highlight the failure or weaknesses of others.

19. I was informed by Senator Mohamad Ezam Mohd Nor at a campaign for Kalamanathan in the Ulu Selangor by election, that Ezam was glad to see me in person for the first time as since he knew Anwar he had been listening to his former mentor bad-mouthing me on every occasion. I now know that Anwar has bad or distorted memories after reading his supporter's comments in this blog.

20. Raja Petra has better memory when he reminded that he was asked to clean the name of Datuk S. K..

21. Referring to Anwar as the Economic Adviser to Selangor state which is under Pakatan Rakyat Raja Petra asked:

h) What's your advice? In the last three years since you have been Economic Adviser, you have gone overseas 60 times in three years. Shouldn't you be staying home running the state? Running the party? Running the coalition? The coalition is in a mess. People are fighting with each other. He seems to be running away.'

22. It is good for the leadership of UMNO and Barisan Nasional to pay attention to what Raja Petra has written. After all the winnings of PR in 2008 have had added advantage of being supported by the Malaysian Civil Liverties Movement led by Raja Petra. I don't think we should forget that the minorities are the rulers in a divided society.

23. Raja Petra further said:

i) I think it's time Najib grabs the bull by the horns and call a spade a spade.

j) Najib must be prepared not only to take a knife but take a chainsaw and cut whatever needs to be cut.

24. I agree with Raja Petra that the Rakyat of Malaysia are tired of the word 'sodomy' and that the agenda for change is not about personalities. There is no way to attach the adjective holy to the word sodomy. A lot of time has been wasted on this issue.

25. I also noted that Raja Petra does not support Barisan National but there is no alternative. He said:

k) This time we go back to Barisan, forget about Pakatan.

CONCLUSION

26. What is important now is to have 'courage' or 'guts'.

27. Some have the courage to defend their wrongs, others have the courage to say the truths, the voters need leaders with the courage to decide, lead and change.

28. That is,

CHANGE FOR THE BETTER.

-Courtesy of Tan Sri  Sanusi Junid

Why I don't support the opposition- an honest opinion from Generation Y

Much hype has been thrown on adrenaline -ridden generation Y supporting the Opposition. Yet the statistic by several opinion surveys prooved  that generation Y is  very much an undecided group -refer to  SURVEY RESULT 

It is also true that the ones making much noise are the group supporting the Opposition. Their opinions are very much in silo - a very homogeneous group that  is affiliated to the kopitiam setting; loud, brazen and very infatuated with the Opposition.

Read one opinion by brave Adelyn Yeoh. Yes, I reiterate, BRAVE Adelyn Yeoh who dare not to jump into the bandwagon and be dictated by this  theory based -no life  experience-no knowledge on the history and fabric making of Malaysian society- rhetoric crowd.

"I recently attended a pro-opposition forum that addressed economic issues of the 1990s and I could not help but notice how similar the attendees were. It was not so much in terms of the way they dressed — they were clad in a whole variety of garments — but they were similar in the way they reacted to the speakers.

One could not help but notice the fixated minds of the general audience. The crowd was quite typical of what you would expect of a kopitiam setting; loud, brazen and very infatuated with the opposition party. To me, it was a sea of homogeneous, single-minded people.

When the speakers expectedly gave their very salient, logical points about the issue, it came as no surprise when most of the audience only responded positively to the almost-slanderous jabs at previous government scandals.

All statements made to maintain stability and to seek economic progress went completely ignored. Instead, attendees were more interested to jeer at side statements including but not limited to "kandang-minium", failures of the royal commission of inquiry, submarines and, even, unresolved murder cases.

It then made me wonder if the attendees were there just to feel better about themselves by mocking the government instead of being there to get enlightened. Is this what our voter population has turned into?

Before I go on, I need to make a disclaimer that I am not pardoning the government from its previous sins — admittedly the amount of nonsense that has plagued the country has increased exponentially in recent years.

Yet this does not mean the converse is true i.e. the opposition has a completely clean slate. As such, it is important for voters to not be swept up by emotions, by the adrenaline of collective angst at the government and, instead, adopt a critical view of all parties.

However, we are moving dangerously towards polarising mentalities. Our voter population is splitting into two very distinct groups; pro-opposition or pro-government. As a result, many people are beginning to adopt this mentality of “with us or with them.”

We are moving towards politics based on superficial qualities and this is dangerous because this will lead to us to blindly supporting parties to all ends, including bad ones. It also becomes difficult for groups and organisations that strive to be apolitical to remain apolitical.

Bersih 3.0 is an excellent example of this. The steering committee and more notably Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan had stressed the fact that they are an apolitical organisation but, unfortunately, Bersih suffered the fate of being dragged into looking political due to the conduct of opposition supporters during the rally and the overwhelming presence of opposition leaders".

Anakbukitgantang Comments- Recently an exposé found out that 3 Singaporean high ranking diplomats were involved in Bersih 3.0 Why would they get involve in the internal affairs of Malaysia if not for safekeeping Singapore's vested  interest in Malaysia? AIDC expose the 3 Singaporean diplomats as follows

1. First Secretary (Political), Regina LOW Kay Yin (regina_low@mfa.gov.sg), who wore the ‘regulation’ BERSIH 3.0 yellow T-shirt.

2. First Secretary (Political), Philomena AW Li Fen (philomena_aw@mfa.gov.sg).

3. Deputy High Commissioner and Counsellor, Ariel Eunice TAN Hwi Tiang (ariel_tan@mfa.gov.sg)

All three are diplomatic staff members at the Singapore High Commission in Malaysia, Level 15, West Wing, The Icon, No.1, Jalan 1/68F, Jalan Tun Razak 50400 Kuala Lumpur.

In a related matter, last June 11, Malaysian Foreign Minister, Datuk Seri Anifah Aman said, although their presence may have been to gather information or something else, it was not a smart move.  Read AIDC

Adelyn further rub salt on the Opposition's wound by saying:

"This should not be the way to move forward. This is not the only way for change. Wanting change for our country does not necessitate being pro-opposition. You can yearn for change without subscribing to a single political party, without proclaiming how you will follow a particular party to its death.

You can want change by proclaiming to elect the best party at a particular given time. And it is also important to add that your view should be subject to change if the party fails to meet certain benchmarks.

For these reasons I don’t support the opposition blindly. But that does not mean I support the government either. I support the best party, which happens to be the opposition at this particular time. And for that reason I would be more than happy to give them my support now.

However, if one day the current opposition fails to meet my benchmarks and, instead, the current government meets those very benchmarks, be assured that I will be voting for the government. This is not to say that I am on the fence about my political position.

Like many of you, I want what is best for my country. In order to achieve this, we, as a society, must be willing to put our egos aside, learn to perceive local politics in a more critical manner and vote for the best party, regardless of what that may be".

Sources

Malaysian Insider

AIDC

anakbukitgantang