Showing posts with label International politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International politics. Show all posts

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Tindakan Kerajaan Malaysia maseh berhemah dalam menghadapi pengacau keamanan

Di negara penegak DEMOKRASI seperti Australia, Amerika Syarikat dan Kesatuan Eropah pendemo akan di kepung dengan  kawad dawai berduri, dipukul dengan kayu cota dan ditembak dengan peluru getah. Di Thailand pula pendemo akan ditembak dengan peluru hidup dan tempat tersebut akan dikenakan "curfew" selama beberapa hari.
 
Ingatlah Hadis Sahih Bukhari, "Allah akan takdirkan naiknya pemimpin yg zalim bila penduduk negeri tersebut  zalim". Oleh itu  jangan menzalimi diri kerana  memfitnah Kerajaan Malaysia zalim. Tiada dalil dan nas yang menghalalkan meruntuhkan Kerajaan Islam!
 
Baca artikel asal dalam Bahasa Inggeris di sini
 
I tend to agreed with Nile Bowie, that  the  Malaysian government is still taking the SOFT APPROACH when dealing with dissidents and rowdy crowd that want to topple the government-
 
"Whether we’d like to admit it or not, the authorities have been extremely soft ...on public gatherings, candlelight vigils, and opposition rallies held after the May 5 election. Rallies were met with no resistance; few if any security personnel were in attendance, and attendees were not infringed upon or prevented from exercising their freedom of expression.

As far as I am aware, the police did not exercise force upon any rally-goer, nor did authorities block access to print or digital media that is favourable to the opposition prior to the recent arrests of Adli and others.

By international standards, the response of the state has been extremely liberal. In countries such as Australia, the United States, and within the European Union, public displays of dissent are more often than not met with police batons and ‘less-lethal’ munitions such as rubber bullets. (Malaysia does not use the latter.)

In the regional context, the crowd dispersal protocols in neighbouring countries are significantly more heavy-handed than practices in Malaysia. When Thailand faced significant political unrest in 2010 over challenges to the rule of former PM Abhisit Vejjajiva, the government authorised the use of live ammunition and ordered curfews for several days; popular areas of Bangkok looked like war-zones, the domestic economy nearly ground to a halt, and handfuls of civilian causalities
were incurred " Read more https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/05/29/liberty-sedition-and-jailed-dissidents/

Friday, March 1, 2013

Intel source from Philippines blames The Malaysian Opposition in Lahad Datu Stand Off

Malaysians grieved in silence as 2 brave policemen were killed at the Lahad Datu Stand off with the Sulu soldiers. Al Fatehah to the fallen heroes. Apparently, the Sulu heirs do not act on their own. Intelligence sources in The Phillipines said that these rebel Moro  were instigated to destroy the recently signed Peace Accord between Moslems in Mindanao and Malacanang Palace. Apparently they are being helped by an opposition politician in Malaysia.

This is an excerp from the Inquirer News .  Read on here:

Whether the heirs of the sultanate of Sulu acted on their own to reclaim Sabah or were instigated by an external force to do so, one thing is certain, according to government intelligence sources: It was a business that proved too big for the heirs to handle on their own.
The sources said that the Philippine government’s policy on Sabah is to keep it in the back burner.
But apparently “some people” want to push it forward now. And why now, at this time, is one of the questions government intelligence is looking into.

The sources consistently mentioned three groups that appear to have taken advantage of the decision of the Kirams to pursue their Sabah claim.
“These are groups that wanted to ride on the Kirams’ pursuit with their own interests in mind,” one of the sources said.
Another source added: “There are a lot who can gain from this, not just in the Philippines but in Malaysia as well.”
These “external factors,” as an Inquirer source described the groups, are one small faction that is in it for the money, an anti-Aquino administration group, and the Malaysian political opposition.
“The Kirams planned to pursue their claim as early as last year. But they went to Lahad Datu also on the instigation of these groups,” the intelligence officer said.

1- The small group supposedly goaded the Kirams to ask Malaysia for a higher rent on Sabah. If Malaysia gives in, this small group would allegedly have a share of the increase.
2- The anti-administration group simply wants to discredit President Aquino and is using the peace process as a cause of disenchantment for the Kirams.
“All those who do not like P-Noy (the President’s nickname) have joined forces. This is one way to really test how this administration will react (to such an issue). Whatever happens in Malaysia, there will be a backlash on us,” one source said.

“In a way, whoever wants to disrupt the peace process or the gains of President Aquino has already won,” the source added.
3- The third group is allegedly the Malaysian political opposition, which is gearing up for general elections that may be called before June.
The intelligence officer said that one member of the Malaysian political opposition allied with Anwar Ibrahim was running for a post in Sabah.
“Apparently, this politician was one of those who spoke with the Kirams. He supposedly gave the opposition’s support to the Kirams’ claim to Sabah,” the source said.